GitHub|Since 2007

siDomovanjevsHosterdamsi

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner3566 ms
Rank#760
TTFB933ms
Time to 1MB1229ms
Score3566
LCP1333ms
FCP1133ms
WPTR Score3733 ms
Rank#290
TTFB587ms
Time to 1MB180ms
Score3733
LCP987ms
FCP787ms

Our Verdict

Hosterdam wins with 587ms TTFB (vs Domovanje's 933ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseDomovanjeHosterdamWinner
DNS Lookup40ms42msDomovanje
TCP Connection50ms134msDomovanje
TLS Handshake94ms47msHosterdam
Server Processing432ms3078msDomovanje
Total TTFB616ms3301msHosterdam

Technology & Security Features

Domovanje

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size74.4 KB

Hosterdam

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size1010.5 KB
0/3
Domovanje Security Features
2/3
Hosterdam Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.