GitHub|Since 2007

siDomovanjevsSi-Shellsi

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score3566 ms
Rank#760
TTFB933ms
Time to 1MB1229ms
Score3566
LCP1333ms
FCP1133ms
WPTR ScoreWinner768 ms
Rank#245
TTFB466ms
Time to 1MB178ms
Score768
LCP866ms
FCP666ms

Our Verdict

Si-Shell wins with 466ms TTFB (vs Domovanje's 933ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseDomovanjeSi-ShellWinner
DNS Lookup40ms80msDomovanje
TCP Connection50ms129msDomovanje
TLS Handshake94ms47msSi-Shell
Server Processing432ms85msSi-Shell
Total TTFB616ms341msSi-Shell

Technology & Security Features

Domovanje

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size74.4 KB

Si-Shell

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size0.0 KB
0/3
Domovanje Security Features
2/3
Si-Shell Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.