GitHub|Since 2007

krDothomevsGabiakr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner26625 ms
Rank#905
TTFB2163ms
Time to 1MB10334ms
Score26625
LCP2563ms
FCP2363ms
WPTR Score187314 ms
Rank#920
TTFB1912ms
Time to 1MB77343ms
Score187314
LCP2312ms
FCP2112ms

Our Verdict

Gabia wins with 1912ms TTFB (vs Dothome's 2163ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseDothomeGabiaWinner
DNS Lookup296ms291msGabia
TCP Connection608ms235msGabia
TLS Handshake309ms253msGabia
Server Processing610ms912msDothome
Total TTFB1823ms1691msGabia

Technology & Security Features

Dothome

Server/CDNnginx/1.20.1
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size101.9 KB

Gabia

Server/CDNgabia server
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size52.4 KB
0/3
Dothome Security Features
0/3
Gabia Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.