GitHub|Since 2007

krDothomevsIvyrokr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner26625 ms
Rank#905
TTFB2163ms
Time to 1MB10334ms
Score26625
LCP2563ms
FCP2363ms
WPTR Score34852 ms
Rank#912
TTFB2299ms
Time to 1MB13846ms
Score34852
LCP2699ms
FCP2499ms

Our Verdict

Dothome wins with 2163ms TTFB (vs Ivyro's 2299ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseDothomeIvyroWinner
DNS Lookup296ms4msIvyro
TCP Connection608ms252msIvyro
TLS Handshake309ms501msDothome
Server Processing610ms865msDothome
Total TTFB1823ms1622msDothome

Technology & Security Features

Dothome

Server/CDNnginx/1.20.1
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size101.9 KB

Ivyro

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size38.8 KB
0/3
Dothome Security Features
0/3
Ivyro Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.