GitHub|Since 2007

krDothomevsMireenekr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner26625 ms
Rank#905
TTFB2163ms
Time to 1MB10334ms
Score26625
LCP2563ms
FCP2363ms
WPTR Score46755 ms
Rank#915
TTFB3435ms
Time to 1MB18904ms
Score46755
LCP3835ms
FCP3635ms

Our Verdict

Dothome wins with 2163ms TTFB (vs Mireene's 3435ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseDothomeMireeneWinner
DNS Lookup296ms292msMireene
TCP Connection608ms264msMireene
TLS Handshake309ms543msDothome
Server Processing610ms286msMireene
Total TTFB1823ms1385msDothome

Technology & Security Features

Dothome

Server/CDNnginx/1.20.1
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size101.9 KB

Mireene

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size243.9 KB
0/3
Dothome Security Features
0/3
Mireene Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.