GitHub|Since 2007

grEasy.grvsPapakigr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score3055 ms
Rank#729
TTFB1060ms
Time to 1MB921ms
Score3055
LCP1460ms
FCP1260ms
WPTR ScoreWinner565 ms
Rank#236
TTFB419ms
Time to 1MB192ms
Score565
LCP819ms
FCP619ms

Our Verdict

Papaki wins with 419ms TTFB (vs Easy.gr's 1060ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEasy.grPapakiWinner
DNS Lookup5ms4msPapaki
TCP Connection140ms13msPapaki
TLS Handshake112ms17msPapaki
Server Processing588ms70msPapaki
Total TTFB845ms104msPapaki

Technology & Security Features

Easy.gr

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size242.9 KB

Papaki

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size114.8 KB
1/3
Easy.gr Security Features
2/3
Papaki Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.