GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

atEasynamevsEDISat

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Easyname
WPTR ScoreWinner1923 ms
Rank#601
TTFB657ms
Time to 1MB662ms
Score1923
LCP1057ms
FCP857ms
EDIS
WPTR Score2111 ms
Rank#567
TTFB616ms
Time to 1MB590ms
Score2111
LCP1016ms
FCP816ms

Our Verdict

EDIS wins with 616ms TTFB (vs Easyname's 657ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEasynameEDISWinner
DNS Lookup90ms145msEasyname
TCP Connection89ms41msEDIS
TLS Handshake85ms47msEDIS
Server Processing70ms462msEasyname
Total TTFB334ms695msEDIS

Technology & Security Features

Easyname

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size153.8 KB

EDIS

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size361.2 KB
1/3
Easyname Security Features
0/3
EDIS Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.