GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

atEasynamevsNessusat

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Easyname
WPTR Score1923 ms
Rank#601
TTFB657ms
Time to 1MB662ms
Score1923
LCP1057ms
FCP857ms
Nessus
WPTR ScoreWinner1479 ms
Rank#532
TTFB992ms
Time to 1MB353ms
Score1479
LCP1392ms
FCP1192ms

Our Verdict

Easyname wins with 657ms TTFB (vs Nessus's 992ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEasynameNessusWinner
DNS Lookup90ms32msNessus
TCP Connection89ms53msNessus
TLS Handshake85ms59msNessus
Server Processing70ms488msEasyname
Total TTFB334ms632msEasyname

Technology & Security Features

Easyname

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size153.8 KB

Nessus

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size234.3 KB
1/3
Easyname Security Features
1/3
Nessus Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.