GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

atEasynamevsOJA.atat

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Easyname
WPTR Score1923 ms
Rank#601
TTFB657ms
Time to 1MB662ms
Score1923
LCP1057ms
FCP857ms
OJA.at
WPTR ScoreWinner1799 ms
Rank#500
TTFB1262ms
Time to 1MB191ms
Score1799
LCP1662ms
FCP1462ms

Our Verdict

Easyname wins with 657ms TTFB (vs OJA.at's 1262ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEasynameOJA.atWinner
DNS Lookup90ms107msEasyname
TCP Connection89ms45msOJA.at
TLS Handshake85ms43msOJA.at
Server Processing70ms1146msEasyname
Total TTFB334ms1341msEasyname

Technology & Security Features

Easyname

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size153.8 KB

OJA.at

Server/CDNApache/2.4.58
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size582.3 KB
1/3
Easyname Security Features
0/3
OJA.at Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.