GitHub|Since 2007

GBEasyspacevsRamsacGB

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR Score4560 ms
Rank#796
TTFB847ms
Time to 1MB1699ms
Score4560
LCP1247ms
FCP1047ms
WPTR ScoreWinner2782 ms
Rank#688
TTFB1125ms
Time to 1MB725ms
Score2782
LCP1525ms
FCP1325ms

Our Verdict

Easyspace wins with 847ms TTFB (vs Ramsac's 1125ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEasyspaceRamsacWinner
DNS Lookup4ms62msEasyspace
TCP Connection118ms14msRamsac
TLS Handshake141ms17msRamsac
Server Processing219ms949msEasyspace
Total TTFB482ms1042msEasyspace

Technology & Security Features

Easyspace

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size87.7 KB

Ramsac

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size129.0 KB
1/3
Easyspace Security Features
3/3
Ramsac Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.