GitHub|Since 2007

GBEasyspacevsSystemagicGB

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score4411 ms
Rank#793
TTFB891ms
Time to 1MB1638ms
Score4411
LCP1291ms
FCP1091ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1556 ms
Rank#430
TTFB328ms
Time to 1MB466ms
Score1556
LCP728ms
FCP528ms

Our Verdict

Systemagic wins with 328ms TTFB (vs Easyspace's 891ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEasyspaceSystemagicWinner
DNS Lookup51ms83msEasyspace
TCP Connection69ms141msEasyspace
TLS Handshake134ms113msSystemagic
Server Processing226ms101msSystemagic
Total TTFB480ms438msSystemagic

Technology & Security Features

Easyspace

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size87.7 KB

Systemagic

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size149.5 KB
1/3
Easyspace Security Features
0/3
Systemagic Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.