EasyspacevsSystemagic
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

Easyspace
View Details →
Systemagic
View Details →Our Verdict
Systemagic wins with 328ms TTFB (vs Easyspace's 891ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Easyspace | Systemagic | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 51ms | 83ms | Easyspace |
| TCP Connection | 69ms | 141ms | Easyspace |
| TLS Handshake | 134ms | 113ms | Systemagic |
| Server Processing | 226ms | 101ms | Systemagic |
| Total TTFB | 480ms | 438ms | Systemagic |
Technology & Security Features
Easyspace
Systemagic
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.