GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

atEDISvsIPAXat

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/26/2026

EDIS
WPTR Score1391 ms
Rank#354
TTFB565ms
Time to 1MB296ms
Score1391
LCP965ms
FCP765ms
IPAX
WPTR ScoreWinner558 ms
Rank#68
TTFB151ms
Time to 1MB127ms
Score558
LCP551ms
FCP351ms

Our Verdict

IPAX wins with 151ms TTFB (vs EDIS's 565ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEDISIPAXWinner
DNS Lookup167ms89msIPAX
TCP Connection39ms40msEDIS
TLS Handshake43ms51msEDIS
Server Processing432ms73msIPAX
Total TTFB681ms253msIPAX

Technology & Security Features

EDIS

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size361.2 KB

IPAX

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size153.7 KB
0/3
EDIS Security Features
1/3
IPAX Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.