EgensajtvsFS Data
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

Egensajt
View Details →
FS Data
View Details →Our Verdict
Egensajt wins with 914ms TTFB (vs FS Data's 1490ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Egensajt | FS Data | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 143ms | 6ms | FS Data |
| TCP Connection | 138ms | 15ms | FS Data |
| TLS Handshake | 160ms | 20ms | FS Data |
| Server Processing | 252ms | 2032ms | Egensajt |
| Total TTFB | 693ms | 2073ms | Egensajt |
Technology & Security Features
Egensajt
FS Data
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.