GitHub|Since 2007

seEgensajtvsFS Datase

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner1351 ms
Rank#466
TTFB914ms
Time to 1MB274ms
Score1351
LCP1314ms
FCP1114ms
WPTR Score2371 ms
Rank#522
TTFB1490ms
Time to 1MB124ms
Score2371
LCP1890ms
FCP1690ms

Our Verdict

Egensajt wins with 914ms TTFB (vs FS Data's 1490ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEgensajtFS DataWinner
DNS Lookup143ms6msFS Data
TCP Connection138ms15msFS Data
TLS Handshake160ms20msFS Data
Server Processing252ms2032msEgensajt
Total TTFB693ms2073msEgensajt

Technology & Security Features

Egensajt

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size46.8 KB

FS Data

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size239.6 KB
1/3
Egensajt Security Features
1/3
FS Data Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.