GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

seEgensajtvsGleSYSse

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Egensajt
WPTR Score1351 ms
Rank#466
TTFB914ms
Time to 1MB274ms
Score1351
LCP1314ms
FCP1114ms
GleSYS
WPTR ScoreWinner1185 ms
Rank#335
TTFB282ms
Time to 1MB349ms
Score1185
LCP682ms
FCP482ms

Our Verdict

GleSYS wins with 282ms TTFB (vs Egensajt's 914ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEgensajtGleSYSWinner
DNS Lookup143ms65msGleSYS
TCP Connection138ms71msGleSYS
TLS Handshake160ms75msGleSYS
Server Processing252ms136msGleSYS
Total TTFB693ms347msGleSYS

Technology & Security Features

Egensajt

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size46.8 KB

GleSYS

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size271.1 KB
1/3
Egensajt Security Features
0/3
GleSYS Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.