GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

seEgensajtvsInleedse

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Egensajt
WPTR ScoreWinner1351 ms
Rank#466
TTFB914ms
Time to 1MB274ms
Score1351
LCP1314ms
FCP1114ms
Inleed
WPTR Score1524 ms
Rank#395
TTFB568ms
Time to 1MB311ms
Score1524
LCP968ms
FCP768ms

Our Verdict

Inleed wins with 568ms TTFB (vs Egensajt's 914ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEgensajtInleedWinner
DNS Lookup143ms194msEgensajt
TCP Connection138ms263msEgensajt
TLS Handshake160ms59msInleed
Server Processing252ms262msEgensajt
Total TTFB693ms778msInleed

Technology & Security Features

Egensajt

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size46.8 KB

Inleed

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size496.4 KB
1/3
Egensajt Security Features
1/3
Inleed Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.