GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

itEhiwebvsIrideosit

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Ehiweb
WPTR ScoreWinner1725 ms
Rank#533
TTFB502ms
Time to 1MB560ms
Score1725
LCP902ms
FCP702ms
Irideos
WPTR Score3374 ms
Rank#754
TTFB2480ms
Time to 1MB509ms
Score3374
LCP2880ms
FCP2680ms

Our Verdict

Ehiweb wins with 502ms TTFB (vs Irideos's 2480ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEhiwebIrideosWinner
DNS Lookup38ms56msEhiweb
TCP Connection93ms93msTie
TLS Handshake58ms100msEhiweb
Server Processing192ms1903msEhiweb
Total TTFB381ms2152msEhiweb

Technology & Security Features

Ehiweb

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size152.1 KB

Irideos

Server/CDNMicrosoft-IIS/10.0
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size374.6 KB
1/3
Ehiweb Security Features
1/3
Irideos Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.