GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

itEhiwebvsSeewebit

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Ehiweb
WPTR Score1725 ms
Rank#533
TTFB502ms
Time to 1MB560ms
Score1725
LCP902ms
FCP702ms
Seeweb
WPTR ScoreWinner849 ms
Rank#252
TTFB345ms
Time to 1MB236ms
Score849
LCP745ms
FCP545ms

Our Verdict

Seeweb wins with 345ms TTFB (vs Ehiweb's 502ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEhiwebSeewebWinner
DNS Lookup38ms49msEhiweb
TCP Connection93ms88msSeeweb
TLS Handshake58ms80msEhiweb
Server Processing192ms66msSeeweb
Total TTFB381ms283msSeeweb

Technology & Security Features

Ehiweb

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size152.1 KB

Seeweb

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size43.5 KB
1/3
Ehiweb Security Features
1/3
Seeweb Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.