GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

GBEnhancedvsNetitudeGB

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Enhanced
WPTR Score1133 ms
Rank#192
TTFB117ms
Time to 1MB285ms
Score1133
LCP517ms
FCP317ms
Netitude
WPTR ScoreWinner533 ms
Rank#29
TTFB90ms
Time to 1MB115ms
Score533
LCP490ms
FCP290ms

Our Verdict

Netitude wins with 90ms TTFB (vs Enhanced's 117ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEnhancedNetitudeWinner
DNS Lookup134ms116msNetitude
TCP Connection121ms4msNetitude
TLS Handshake8ms9msEnhanced
Server Processing186ms128msNetitude
Total TTFB449ms257msNetitude

Technology & Security Features

Enhanced

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size255.9 KB

Netitude

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size207.5 KB
2/3
Enhanced Security Features
3/3
Netitude Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.