EnhancedvsRazorblue
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

Enhanced
View Details →
Razorblue
View Details →Our Verdict
Enhanced wins with 117ms TTFB (vs Razorblue's 359ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Enhanced | Razorblue | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 134ms | 224ms | Enhanced |
| TCP Connection | 121ms | 41ms | Razorblue |
| TLS Handshake | 8ms | 74ms | Enhanced |
| Server Processing | 186ms | 778ms | Enhanced |
| Total TTFB | 449ms | 1117ms | Enhanced |
Technology & Security Features
Enhanced
Razorblue
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.