Entorno DigitalvsSered
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

Entorno Digital
View Details →
Sered
View Details →Our Verdict
Sered wins with 235ms TTFB (vs Entorno Digital's 847ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Entorno Digital | Sered | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 43ms | 4ms | Sered |
| TCP Connection | 192ms | 64ms | Sered |
| TLS Handshake | 93ms | 65ms | Sered |
| Server Processing | 335ms | 6892ms | Entorno Digital |
| Total TTFB | 663ms | 7025ms | Sered |
Technology & Security Features
Entorno Digital
Sered
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.