GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

GBEntrust ITvsLIMAGB

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Entrust IT
WPTR ScoreWinner3284 ms
Rank#764
TTFB1736ms
Time to 1MB954ms
Score3284
LCP2136ms
FCP1936ms
LIMA
WPTR Score4902 ms
Rank#815
TTFB2474ms
Time to 1MB1333ms
Score4902
LCP2874ms
FCP2674ms

Our Verdict

Entrust IT wins with 1736ms TTFB (vs LIMA's 2474ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEntrust ITLIMAWinner
DNS Lookup496ms167msLIMA
TCP Connection320ms53msLIMA
TLS Handshake80ms50msLIMA
Server Processing98ms1433msEntrust IT
Total TTFB994ms1703msEntrust IT

Technology & Security Features

Entrust IT

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size240.4 KB

LIMA

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size186.2 KB
0/3
Entrust IT Security Features
0/3
LIMA Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.