GitHub|Since 2007

GBEntrust ITvsSysGroupGB

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR Score3284 ms
Rank#764
TTFB1736ms
Time to 1MB954ms
Score3284
LCP2136ms
FCP1936ms
WPTR ScoreWinner2926 ms
Rank#714
TTFB685ms
Time to 1MB1025ms
Score2926
LCP1085ms
FCP885ms

Our Verdict

SysGroup wins with 685ms TTFB (vs Entrust IT's 1736ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEntrust ITSysGroupWinner
DNS Lookup496ms33msSysGroup
TCP Connection320ms12msSysGroup
TLS Handshake80ms5msSysGroup
Server Processing98ms416msEntrust IT
Total TTFB994ms466msSysGroup

Technology & Security Features

Entrust IT

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size240.4 KB

SysGroup

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size102.3 KB
0/3
Entrust IT Security Features
1/3
SysGroup Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.