GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

itErgonetvsServerPlanit

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Ergonet
WPTR ScoreWinner438 ms
Rank#59
TTFB171ms
Time to 1MB112ms
Score438
LCP571ms
FCP371ms
ServerPlan
WPTR Score1974 ms
Rank#595
TTFB621ms
Time to 1MB671ms
Score1974
LCP1021ms
FCP821ms

Our Verdict

Ergonet wins with 171ms TTFB (vs ServerPlan's 621ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseErgonetServerPlanWinner
DNS Lookup6ms106msErgonet
TCP Connection14ms54msErgonet
TLS Handshake19ms52msErgonet
Server Processing130ms152msErgonet
Total TTFB169ms364msErgonet

Technology & Security Features

Ergonet

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size169.5 KB

ServerPlan

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size142.8 KB
1/3
Ergonet Security Features
1/3
ServerPlan Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.