GitHub|Since 2007

ptEsotéricovsLusoVPSpt

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score5462 ms
Rank#785
TTFB1729ms
Time to 1MB1175ms
Score5462
LCP2129ms
FCP1929ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1941 ms
Rank#518
TTFB698ms
Time to 1MB449ms
Score1941
LCP1098ms
FCP898ms

Our Verdict

LusoVPS wins with 698ms TTFB (vs Esotérico's 1729ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEsotéricoLusoVPSWinner
DNS Lookup332ms218msLusoVPS
TCP Connection380ms283msLusoVPS
TLS Handshake140ms106msLusoVPS
Server Processing1790ms256msLusoVPS
Total TTFB2642ms863msLusoVPS

Technology & Security Features

Esotérico

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size117.8 KB

LusoVPS

Server/CDNApache/2.4.66 (Debia
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size20.8 KB
0/3
Esotérico Security Features
0/3
LusoVPS Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.