eWallHostvsSahara Net
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

eWallHost
View Details →
Sahara Net
View Details →Our Verdict
eWallHost wins with 59ms TTFB (vs Sahara Net's 1256ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | eWallHost | Sahara Net | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 36ms | 588ms | eWallHost |
| TCP Connection | 14ms | 641ms | eWallHost |
| TLS Handshake | 20ms | 279ms | eWallHost |
| Server Processing | 30ms | 353ms | eWallHost |
| Total TTFB | 100ms | 1861ms | eWallHost |
Technology & Security Features
eWallHost
Sahara Net
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.