GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

myExabytesvsShinjirumy

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Exabytes
WPTR Score1706 ms
Rank#487
TTFB38ms
Time to 1MB678ms
Score1706
LCP438ms
FCP238ms
Shinjiru
WPTR ScoreWinner1176 ms
Rank#146
TTFB287ms
Time to 1MB148ms
Score1176
LCP687ms
FCP487ms

Our Verdict

Exabytes wins with 38ms TTFB (vs Shinjiru's 287ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseExabytesShinjiruWinner
DNS Lookup45ms49msExabytes
TCP Connection5ms11msExabytes
TLS Handshake11ms17msExabytes
Server Processing18ms744msExabytes
Total TTFB79ms821msExabytes

Technology & Security Features

Exabytes

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size9.4 KB

Shinjiru

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size186.5 KB
2/3
Exabytes Security Features
2/3
Shinjiru Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.