GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

MYExabytesvsShinjirumy

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Exabytes
WPTR Score2435 ms
Rank#613
TTFB41ms
Time to 1MB995ms
Score2435
LCP441ms
FCP241ms
Shinjiru
WPTR ScoreWinner1215 ms
Rank#134
TTFB265ms
Time to 1MB154ms
Score1215
LCP665ms
FCP465ms

Our Verdict

Exabytes wins with 41ms TTFB (vs Shinjiru's 265ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseExabytesShinjiruWinner
DNS Lookup16ms45msExabytes
TCP Connection5ms13msExabytes
TLS Handshake9ms16msExabytes
Server Processing17ms771msExabytes
Total TTFB47ms845msExabytes

Technology & Security Features

Exabytes

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size9.4 KB

Shinjiru

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size186.5 KB
2/3
Exabytes Security Features
2/3
Shinjiru Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.