GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

NLExonetvsSnel.comNL

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Exonet
WPTR Score937 ms
Rank#209
TTFB252ms
Time to 1MB241ms
Score937
LCP652ms
FCP452ms
Snel.com
WPTR ScoreWinner473 ms
Rank#26
TTFB104ms
Time to 1MB105ms
Score473
LCP504ms
FCP304ms

Our Verdict

Snel.com wins with 104ms TTFB (vs Exonet's 252ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseExonetSnel.comWinner
DNS Lookup131ms7msSnel.com
TCP Connection57ms13msSnel.com
TLS Handshake61ms20msSnel.com
Server Processing110ms181msExonet
Total TTFB359ms221msSnel.com

Technology & Security Features

Exonet

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size88.9 KB

Snel.com

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size259.9 KB
1/3
Exonet Security Features
3/3
Snel.com Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.