ExoscalevsInfomaniak
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Exoscale
View Details →
Infomaniak
View Details →Our Verdict
Exoscale wins with 244ms TTFB (vs Infomaniak's 497ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Exoscale | Infomaniak | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 86ms | 1ms | Infomaniak |
| TCP Connection | 41ms | 42ms | Exoscale |
| TLS Handshake | 42ms | 45ms | Exoscale |
| Server Processing | 50ms | 144ms | Exoscale |
| Total TTFB | 219ms | 232ms | Exoscale |
Technology & Security Features
Exoscale
Infomaniak
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.