GitHub|Since 2007

chExoscalevsInfomaniakch

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score773 ms
Rank#199
TTFB244ms
Time to 1MB231ms
Score773
LCP644ms
FCP444ms
WPTR ScoreWinner614 ms
Rank#231
TTFB497ms
Time to 1MB159ms
Score614
LCP897ms
FCP697ms

Our Verdict

Exoscale wins with 244ms TTFB (vs Infomaniak's 497ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseExoscaleInfomaniakWinner
DNS Lookup86ms1msInfomaniak
TCP Connection41ms42msExoscale
TLS Handshake42ms45msExoscale
Server Processing50ms144msExoscale
Total TTFB219ms232msExoscale

Technology & Security Features

Exoscale

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size47.3 KB

Infomaniak

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size3197.7 KB
2/3
Exoscale Security Features
1/3
Infomaniak Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.