ExoscalevsNovatrend
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

Exoscale
View Details →
Novatrend
View Details →Our Verdict
Exoscale wins with 260ms TTFB (vs Novatrend's 709ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Exoscale | Novatrend | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 141ms | 38ms | Novatrend |
| TCP Connection | 273ms | 42ms | Novatrend |
| TLS Handshake | 69ms | 41ms | Novatrend |
| Server Processing | 43ms | 37ms | Novatrend |
| Total TTFB | 526ms | 158ms | Exoscale |
Technology & Security Features
Exoscale
Novatrend
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.