GitHub|Since 2007

noFastNamevsPRO ISPno

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score1914 ms
Rank#572
TTFB922ms
Time to 1MB479ms
Score1914
LCP1322ms
FCP1122ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1289 ms
Rank#356
TTFB611ms
Time to 1MB231ms
Score1289
LCP1011ms
FCP811ms

Our Verdict

PRO ISP wins with 611ms TTFB (vs FastName's 922ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseFastNamePRO ISPWinner
DNS Lookup122ms274msFastName
TCP Connection177ms134msPRO ISP
TLS Handshake69ms257msFastName
Server Processing396ms70msPRO ISP
Total TTFB764ms735msPRO ISP

Technology & Security Features

FastName

Server/CDNopenresty
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size57.0 KB

PRO ISP

Server/CDNopenresty
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size46.6 KB
1/3
FastName Security Features
1/3
PRO ISP Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.