GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

noFastNamevsSyseno

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

FastName
WPTR Score1914 ms
Rank#572
TTFB922ms
Time to 1MB479ms
Score1914
LCP1322ms
FCP1122ms
Syse
WPTR ScoreWinner1353 ms
Rank#439
TTFB495ms
Time to 1MB409ms
Score1353
LCP895ms
FCP695ms

Our Verdict

Syse wins with 495ms TTFB (vs FastName's 922ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseFastNameSyseWinner
DNS Lookup122ms152msFastName
TCP Connection177ms67msSyse
TLS Handshake69ms68msSyse
Server Processing396ms84msSyse
Total TTFB764ms371msSyse

Technology & Security Features

FastName

Server/CDNopenresty
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size57.0 KB

Syse

Server/CDNApache/2.4.41 (Ubunt
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size27.0 KB
1/3
FastName Security Features
1/3
Syse Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.