GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

huForpsivsSybellhu

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Forpsi
WPTR ScoreWinner725 ms
Rank#176
TTFB352ms
Time to 1MB158ms
Score725
LCP752ms
FCP552ms
Sybell
WPTR Score1037 ms
Rank#278
TTFB80ms
Time to 1MB375ms
Score1037
LCP480ms
FCP280ms

Our Verdict

Sybell wins with 80ms TTFB (vs Forpsi's 352ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseForpsiSybellWinner
DNS Lookup43ms26msSybell
TCP Connection14ms51msForpsi
TLS Handshake16ms28msForpsi
Server Processing273ms32msSybell
Total TTFB346ms137msSybell

Technology & Security Features

Forpsi

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size134.9 KB

Sybell

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size120.3 KB
1/3
Forpsi Security Features
3/3
Sybell Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.