GitHub|Since 2007

uaFREEhostvsMirohostua

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score1483 ms
Rank#410
TTFB279ms
Time to 1MB450ms
Score1483
LCP679ms
FCP479ms
WPTR ScoreWinner910 ms
Rank#324
TTFB492ms
Time to 1MB251ms
Score910
LCP892ms
FCP692ms

Our Verdict

FREEhost wins with 279ms TTFB (vs Mirohost's 492ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseFREEhostMirohostWinner
DNS Lookup4ms58msFREEhost
TCP Connection72ms56msMirohost
TLS Handshake73ms56msMirohost
Server Processing254ms138msMirohost
Total TTFB403ms308msFREEhost

Technology & Security Features

FREEhost

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size164.9 KB

Mirohost

Server/CDNnginx/1.12.0
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size40.5 KB
0/3
FREEhost Security Features
1/3
Mirohost Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.