GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

seFS DatavsLoopiase

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

FS Data
WPTR ScoreWinner2782 ms
Rank#397
TTFB333ms
Time to 1MB405ms
Score2782
LCP733ms
FCP533ms
Loopia
WPTR Score15344 ms
Rank#885
TTFB552ms
Time to 1MB6245ms
Score15344
LCP952ms
FCP752ms

Our Verdict

FS Data wins with 333ms TTFB (vs Loopia's 552ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseFS DataLoopiaWinner
DNS Lookup26ms120msFS Data
TCP Connection14ms75msFS Data
TLS Handshake20ms75msFS Data
Server Processing1750ms86msLoopia
Total TTFB1810ms356msFS Data

Technology & Security Features

FS Data

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size239.6 KB

Loopia

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size53.5 KB
1/3
FS Data Security Features
1/3
Loopia Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.