GitHub|Since 2007

krGabiavsKSIDCkr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score164861 ms
Rank#918
TTFB1911ms
Time to 1MB68055ms
Score164861
LCP2311ms
FCP2111ms
WPTR ScoreWinner271 ms
Rank#775
TTFB3710ms
Time to 1MB113ms
Score271
LCP4110ms
FCP3910ms

Our Verdict

Gabia wins with 1911ms TTFB (vs KSIDC's 3710ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseGabiaKSIDCWinner
DNS Lookup256ms0msKSIDC
TCP Connection132ms0msKSIDC
TLS Handshake257ms0msKSIDC
Server Processing884ms0msKSIDC
Total TTFB1529ms0msGabia

Technology & Security Features

Gabia

Server/CDNgabia server
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size52.4 KB

KSIDC

Server/CDNiteasy
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size129.9 KB
0/3
Gabia Security Features
0/3
KSIDC Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.