GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

krGabiavsMireenekr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Gabia
WPTR Score187314 ms
Rank#920
TTFB1912ms
Time to 1MB77343ms
Score187314
LCP2312ms
FCP2112ms
Mireene
WPTR ScoreWinner46755 ms
Rank#915
TTFB3435ms
Time to 1MB18904ms
Score46755
LCP3835ms
FCP3635ms

Our Verdict

Gabia wins with 1912ms TTFB (vs Mireene's 3435ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseGabiaMireeneWinner
DNS Lookup291ms292msGabia
TCP Connection235ms264msGabia
TLS Handshake253ms543msGabia
Server Processing912ms286msMireene
Total TTFB1691ms1385msGabia

Technology & Security Features

Gabia

Server/CDNgabia server
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size52.4 KB

Mireene

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size243.9 KB
0/3
Gabia Security Features
0/3
Mireene Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.