GitHub|Since 2007

esGinernetvsHostinetes

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score2747 ms
Rank#694
TTFB330ms
Time to 1MB978ms
Score2747
LCP730ms
FCP530ms
WPTR ScoreWinner2102 ms
Rank#585
TTFB542ms
Time to 1MB672ms
Score2102
LCP942ms
FCP742ms

Our Verdict

Ginernet wins with 330ms TTFB (vs Hostinet's 542ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseGinernetHostinetWinner
DNS Lookup109ms216msGinernet
TCP Connection179ms68msHostinet
TLS Handshake59ms138msGinernet
Server Processing53ms67msGinernet
Total TTFB400ms489msGinernet

Technology & Security Features

Ginernet

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size101.4 KB

Hostinet

Server/CDNApache/2.4.25 (Debia
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size154.0 KB
3/3
Ginernet Security Features
1/3
Hostinet Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.