GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

esGinernetvsSeredes

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Ginernet
WPTR ScoreWinner2747 ms
Rank#694
TTFB330ms
Time to 1MB978ms
Score2747
LCP730ms
FCP530ms
Sered
WPTR Score7606 ms
Rank#215
TTFB235ms
Time to 1MB242ms
Score7606
LCP635ms
FCP435ms

Our Verdict

Sered wins with 235ms TTFB (vs Ginernet's 330ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseGinernetSeredWinner
DNS Lookup109ms4msSered
TCP Connection179ms64msSered
TLS Handshake59ms65msGinernet
Server Processing53ms6892msGinernet
Total TTFB400ms7025msSered

Technology & Security Features

Ginernet

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size101.4 KB

Sered

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size392.6 KB
3/3
Ginernet Security Features
2/3
Sered Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.