Global SwitchvsKrystal Hosting
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

Global Switch
View Details →
Krystal Hosting
View Details →Our Verdict
Global Switch wins with 179ms TTFB (vs Krystal Hosting's 203ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Global Switch | Krystal Hosting | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 269ms | 126ms | Krystal Hosting |
| TCP Connection | 47ms | 55ms | Global Switch |
| TLS Handshake | 7ms | 57ms | Global Switch |
| Server Processing | 239ms | 53ms | Krystal Hosting |
| Total TTFB | 562ms | 291ms | Global Switch |
Technology & Security Features
Global Switch
Krystal Hosting
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.