GMO InternetvsSakura Internet
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

GMO Internet
View Details →
Sakura Internet
View Details →Our Verdict
GMO Internet wins with 2479ms TTFB (vs Sakura Internet's 2925ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | GMO Internet | Sakura Internet | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 84ms | 1456ms | GMO Internet |
| TCP Connection | 10ms | 934ms | GMO Internet |
| TLS Handshake | 10ms | 631ms | GMO Internet |
| Server Processing | 1396ms | 280ms | Sakura Internet |
| Total TTFB | 1500ms | 3301ms | GMO Internet |
Technology & Security Features
GMO Internet
Sakura Internet
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.