GitHub|Since 2007

inGo4HostingvsHostLeloin

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score1096 ms
Rank#157
TTFB269ms
Time to 1MB163ms
Score1096
LCP669ms
FCP469ms
WPTR ScoreWinner761 ms
Rank#189
TTFB507ms
Time to 1MB102ms
Score761
LCP907ms
FCP707ms

Our Verdict

Go4Hosting wins with 269ms TTFB (vs HostLelo's 507ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseGo4HostingHostLeloWinner
DNS Lookup33ms68msGo4Hosting
TCP Connection14ms39msGo4Hosting
TLS Handshake32ms116msGo4Hosting
Server Processing626ms293msHostLelo
Total TTFB705ms516msGo4Hosting

Technology & Security Features

Go4Hosting

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size101.5 KB

HostLelo

Server/CDNVercel
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size211.5 KB
2/3
Go4Hosting Security Features
2/3
HostLelo Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.