GitHub|Since 2007

inGo4HostingvsMilesWebin

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner1115 ms
Rank#143
TTFB277ms
Time to 1MB146ms
Score1115
LCP677ms
FCP477ms
WPTR Score2485 ms
Rank#651
TTFB30ms
Time to 1MB995ms
Score2485
LCP430ms
FCP230ms

Our Verdict

MilesWeb wins with 30ms TTFB (vs Go4Hosting's 277ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseGo4HostingMilesWebWinner
DNS Lookup35ms64msGo4Hosting
TCP Connection14ms6msMilesWeb
TLS Handshake29ms11msMilesWeb
Server Processing687ms16msMilesWeb
Total TTFB765ms97msMilesWeb

Technology & Security Features

Go4Hosting

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size101.5 KB

MilesWeb

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size9.4 KB
2/3
Go4Hosting Security Features
2/3
MilesWeb Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.