GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

esGuebsvsHostaliaes

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Guebs
WPTR Score3066 ms
Rank#751
TTFB1476ms
Time to 1MB913ms
Score3066
LCP1876ms
FCP1676ms
Hostalia
WPTR ScoreWinner1385 ms
Rank#433
TTFB999ms
Time to 1MB194ms
Score1385
LCP1399ms
FCP1199ms

Our Verdict

Hostalia wins with 999ms TTFB (vs Guebs's 1476ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseGuebsHostaliaWinner
DNS Lookup157ms165msGuebs
TCP Connection229ms5msHostalia
TLS Handshake137ms9msHostalia
Server Processing352ms740msGuebs
Total TTFB875ms919msHostalia

Technology & Security Features

Guebs

Server/CDNPHP/8.3.8
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size145.5 KB

Hostalia

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size70.0 KB
1/3
Guebs Security Features
2/3
Hostalia Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.