GitHub|Since 2007

GBHeart InternetvsSiteGround UKGB

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

Heart Internet

Heart Internet

View Details
WPTR ScoreWinner994 ms
Rank#279
TTFB412ms
Time to 1MB235ms
Score994
LCP812ms
FCP612ms
SiteGround UK

SiteGround UK

View Details
WPTR Score1049 ms
Rank#350
TTFB431ms
Time to 1MB302ms
Score1049
LCP831ms
FCP631ms

Our Verdict

Heart Internet wins with 412ms TTFB (vs SiteGround UK's 431ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHeart InternetSiteGround UKWinner
DNS Lookup8ms117msHeart Internet
TCP Connection11ms49msHeart Internet
TLS Handshake16ms17msHeart Internet
Server Processing395ms141msSiteGround UK
Total TTFB430ms324msHeart Internet

Technology & Security Features

Heart Internet

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size45.2 KB

SiteGround UK

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size91.7 KB
3/3
Heart Internet Security Features
2/3
SiteGround UK Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.