GitHub|Since 2007

plHekkovsLH.plpl

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score3026 ms
Rank#637
TTFB626ms
Time to 1MB756ms
Score3026
LCP1026ms
FCP826ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1016 ms
Rank#351
TTFB528ms
Time to 1MB263ms
Score1016
LCP928ms
FCP728ms

Our Verdict

LH.pl wins with 528ms TTFB (vs Hekko's 626ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHekkoLH.plWinner
DNS Lookup44ms62msHekko
TCP Connection100ms57msLH.pl
TLS Handshake62ms58msLH.pl
Server Processing1006ms208msLH.pl
Total TTFB1212ms385msLH.pl

Technology & Security Features

Hekko

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size201.4 KB

LH.pl

Server/CDNApache/2
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size295.4 KB
2/3
Hekko Security Features
1/3
LH.pl Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.