GitHub|Since 2007

plHome.plvsHostersipl

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score893 ms
Rank#251
TTFB334ms
Time to 1MB240ms
Score893
LCP734ms
FCP534ms
WPTR ScoreWinner741 ms
Rank#168
TTFB170ms
Time to 1MB219ms
Score741
LCP570ms
FCP370ms

Our Verdict

Hostersi wins with 170ms TTFB (vs Home.pl's 334ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHome.plHostersiWinner
DNS Lookup44ms94msHome.pl
TCP Connection42ms39msHostersi
TLS Handshake80ms40msHostersi
Server Processing151ms42msHostersi
Total TTFB317ms215msHostersi

Technology & Security Features

Home.pl

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size277.3 KB

Hostersi

Server/CDNAmazonS3
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size63.7 KB
0/3
Home.pl Security Features
1/3
Hostersi Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.