HonestingvsNominalia
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

Honesting
View Details →
Nominalia
View Details →Our Verdict
Honesting wins with 205ms TTFB (vs Nominalia's 481ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Honesting | Nominalia | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 220ms | 45ms | Nominalia |
| TCP Connection | 302ms | 99ms | Nominalia |
| TLS Handshake | 74ms | 108ms | Honesting |
| Server Processing | 69ms | 55ms | Nominalia |
| Total TTFB | 665ms | 307ms | Honesting |
Technology & Security Features
Honesting
Nominalia
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.