GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

itHost.itvsWeb4Webit

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Host.it
WPTR ScoreWinner787 ms
Rank#162
TTFB261ms
Time to 1MB174ms
Score787
LCP661ms
FCP461ms
Web4Web
WPTR Score2359 ms
Rank#620
TTFB397ms
Time to 1MB819ms
Score2359
LCP797ms
FCP597ms

Our Verdict

Host.it wins with 261ms TTFB (vs Web4Web's 397ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHost.itWeb4WebWinner
DNS Lookup109ms148msHost.it
TCP Connection99ms81msWeb4Web
TLS Handshake58ms84msHost.it
Server Processing103ms80msWeb4Web
Total TTFB369ms393msHost.it

Technology & Security Features

Host.it

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size0.1 KB

Web4Web

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size10.6 KB
3/3
Host.it Security Features
0/3
Web4Web Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.