GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

noHost1vsUniwebno

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Host1
WPTR ScoreWinner1642 ms
Rank#574
TTFB795ms
Time to 1MB548ms
Score1642
LCP1195ms
FCP995ms
Uniweb
WPTR Score1976 ms
Rank#582
TTFB536ms
Time to 1MB673ms
Score1976
LCP936ms
FCP736ms

Our Verdict

Uniweb wins with 536ms TTFB (vs Host1's 795ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHost1UniwebWinner
DNS Lookup1ms111msHost1
TCP Connection75ms114msHost1
TLS Handshake154ms69msUniweb
Server Processing97ms67msUniweb
Total TTFB327ms361msUniweb

Technology & Security Features

Host1

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size12.4 KB

Uniweb

Server/CDNWP.one
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size241.2 KB
1/3
Host1 Security Features
1/3
Uniweb Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.